Nowadays, distance-learning programs are such common thing for us, but some people argue that they're not as good as those by attending in a college or university in person. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the development of modern technology, remote-learning programs have gained its reputation in the past decades. People nowadays can acquire latest knowledge through the internet, television and videos. However, there are also many people worrying about whether the new form of education can have the same effects compared to studying in person. In my view, such a novel way of learning enables many people to learn more flexibly, but it has its drawbacks.
Firstly, people can arrange their learning schedule more flexibly by attending distance-learning. For example, people who have employment may be busy in some specific time period, such as the holidays seasons for supermarket clerks. Previously, these working people have limited choices to participate a professional education program due to their inflexible working time. However, after the emerge of remote-learning, they can learn whenever they have time after work.
In addition, modern technology makes the communication between teachers and students more smoothly. When receiving traditional education, student normally can only see their teachers in class. If they have difficulties in study after classes, most of them can not receive proper instructions. On the contrary, students can contact their online lecturers using IM applications and receive evaluations more quickly after they submit course works. Therefore, students will have a more solid understanding about the things they learn.
However, one of the drawbacks about distance-learning is that it is normally not systematically organised compared to traditional education. When enrolling in a college, the education plan is figure out in advance. Such a plan must have been evaluated by professional educators. After being guided by a professional plan, students are more likely to master a more comprehensive knowledge system. In contrast, remote-education is dispersive and people can only learn a certain subject once at a time.
In sum, distance-learning can help people learn more flexibly and boost learning efficiency by offering easier communications between students and teachers. Nevertheless, people should not anticipate too much on the novel education form, because they can hardly build a comprehensive knowledge system through receiving remote-education.
- TPO-21:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- Many countries spend a lot of money in art Some people think investment in art is necessary but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 76
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 50
- The following appeared in a report presented for discussion at a meeting of the directors of a company that manufactures parts for heavy machinery:"The falling revenues that the company is experiencing coincide with delays in manufacturing. These delays, 83
- tpo 4 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'acquire the latest'.
Suggestion: acquire the latest
...n the past decades. People nowadays can acquire latest knowledge through the internet, televis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...inflexible working time. However, after the emerge of remote-learning, they can learn when...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80588235294 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31139899767 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3937068095 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.7 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160731073207 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055341806337 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418728185543 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101811030259 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408116276566 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.