Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Agree or disagree?
As a matter of fact, all different levels of education, from primary school to university, have designed the basic and advance educational goals for students to achieve in their learning process. In my opinion, however, most students spend too much time on learning facts from textbooks or teachers’ lectures, rather than learning the practical skills from classroom which should get ready to be used in daily life or fit in the competitive working places.
Everyone is unique that shall be trained or taught differently. Sadly to say most students receive the same subjects’ study, and learning programs, and individual talent is often ignored by massive quizzes, homework and textbook exercises in all levels of education. Students are not supposed to be omniscient in all subjects to get high grade as a way to prove their abilities or skills learned from schools. In the period of primary school, students should learn more the family value, find happy moment in communication with peers, and know how to protect themselves from strangers. During the days of junior high and high school, students should learn more about personal hygiene, case study of social order, professional skills learning for future career in accordance with personal talent, quality, training and interests.
The advance study in the university is not suitable for everyone. The diploma sometimes proves one who has wasted 4-year study in classroom not to have right skills for a job or to work in the field irrelevant to his or her learning in the university.
In fact, many people take certain courses in night schools so to keep up with the new science or professional skills to improve their work or career. Instead of reading lines of figures, facts or history from textbooks, the particular practices and occupational skill-training are what we need to survive in the competitive society.
To summarize, I agree to spend more time in practical skill training, not only fact learning in all levels of education. If local industries, schools and government work together to bridge educational purposes and goals, students will have promising career and happy life without regrets in spending long time in schools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | erman.duran95 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | abedjar2 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | elveslord77 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Shahla | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | ife bajo | 61 | view |
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 20
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 56
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Agree or disagree? 78
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. 67
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...grets in spending long time in schools.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in fact, as a matter of fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26123595506 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80568766703 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9557064086 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.076923077 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330011218504 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117948357564 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953390202087 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178192581635 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992300823573 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.