The graph below shows the consuption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european county between 1979 and 2004
The provided line graph demonstrates the information about four different consumer goods namely fish, lamb, beef and chicken in the country of Europe from 1979 to 2004.Overall, there is a significant decline on beef and lamb whereas there was experienced the growth of eating of chicken and consumption of fish saw fluctuation at around 50 grams per person per week.
Initially, at the beginning of period (1979), fish was consumed the less about 50 grams , the most famous type of meat was beef , four times more than fish whilst chicken and lamb were around 150 grams per person per week. After a decade, there was witnessed a enormous decrease on beef and lamb and reached to 180 and 110 grams respectively. However, chicken saw a remarkable soar at 200 while there was plateau at 50 grams per person in a week. At the end of period , that change continued and beef and lamb reached at 110 and 90 grams per person per week accordingly whereas chicken rose on 250 and fish was 49 grams.
- Some people think that scientists expirementing with animals in a labaratory is the only way we can guarantee new products will be safe for human use 61
- some people think that universities should provide with konwledge and skills needed in the workplace .Others think taht the true function of a universityshould be to give access to knowladge for its own sake ,regardless of whether the course is usefull to 67
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000 56
- Some people think that scientists expirementing with animals in a labaratory is the only way we can guarantee new products will be safe for human use 84
- the given graph shows information about meat consumption in europe 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...the country of Europe from 1979 to 2004.Overall, there is a significant decline on beef...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ish was consumed the less about 50 grams , the most famous type of meat was beef ,...
^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... , the most famous type of meat was beef , four times more than fish whilst chicke...
^^
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ek. After a decade, there was witnessed a enormous decrease on beef and lamb an...
^
Line 2, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k. After a decade, there was witnessed a enormous decrease on beef and lamb and ...
^^
Line 2, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...there was witnessed a enormous decrease on beef and lamb and reached to 180 and ...
^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r person in a week. At the end of period , that change continued and beef and lamb...
^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at 110 and 90 grams per person per week accordingly whereas chicken rose on 250 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69540229885 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5504704691 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522988505747 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.054027027 43.030603864 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.4 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8 22.9334400587 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0863607894732 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490239007382 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516752759348 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887471613828 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389714521182 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.