do you agree or disagree?Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life, is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or alone?
Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life, now the question is whether it is better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or alone. Everyone with regard to his private features can maintain a specific direction toward this issue, however in my perspective, the advantages which teamwork will bring to us outweigh to working alone. My arguments and reasons are listed below which will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with, needless to say that being alone requires a lot of energy and time. It is plausible that you can avoid from overwhelming with several opinions; however let's try to observe other side of coin. Since there are some members in a group, this opportunity of sharing experiences and ideas will be created by members. As the old saying goes several hands will act better than one hand, consequently a group gives a chance to us to consider to other pros and cons of project.
The second reason why I advocate a group lies the fact of saving time. It is noticeable that the most striking factors in a group are an appropriate schedule and a leader who has a potential ability for dividing labor. One- who works alone- should, nevertheless, consider to mass of project. It goes without saying that a project requires numerous activities like searching for resources, selecting the best parts of resources, translating, interviewing with famous professors or other person, going to institutions and companies for getting information, editing and final evaluating and presenting in the class; hence the role of group in cooperation and participation and saving time will be clear here.
Besides all these arguments, I am inclined to provide a bit of different point. Working in the group can improve interpersonal skills' of members. Take for example a shy person who is forced to work in a group; spontaneously he has to connect with other people in this way. Gradually this man will be able to optimize his personality; consequently this is another benefit of teamwork.
By taking all above mentioned arguments, this conclusion could be drawn that a group due to attendance of different people with diverse backgrounds will be worthwhile because it not only can reduce waste time and selfish feeling, but also it is able to affect on students' function in class in providing creative ideas.
یخ غ
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-15 | peerless alex | 88 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office. 70
- Tpo43 73
- do you agree or disagree? it is easier to become educated today than it was in the past. 81
- do you agree or disagree?in order to celebrate major events, it is better to organize a big party with lots of people than to have a small party where only close friends and relative are invited. 89
- Do you agree or disagree?Media are less concerned about the accuracy of news in compared with the past. 90
Comments
Essay evaluation report
because it not only can reduce waste time and selfish feeling, but also it is able to affect on students' function in class in providing creative ideas.
Description: 'Not only...but also' is not used properly. can you re-write this sentence?
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 408 350
No. of Characters: 1965 1500
No. of Different Words: 229 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.494 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.816 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.77 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 138 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.239 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.29 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.482 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.085 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...whelming with several opinions; however lets try to observe other side of coin. Sinc...
^^^^
Line 8, column 254, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...selfish feeling, but also it is able to affect on students function in class in providing...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, while, as to, for example, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95343137255 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8318901525 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => OK
Sentence length SD: 98.6534337973 48.9658058833 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 134.733333333 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274814738173 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846981579368 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173041383157 0.0737576698707 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142884872089 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129462202226 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.