Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

We are living in a world which is changing rapidly. Many new phenomena have been entered to our lives that were not in the past. It is not surprising to hear that traditional games have been gradually replacing by new computer games and this procedure is going on. I am of the opinion that everything, such as computer games, is not purely advantageous or disadvantageous. Despite the disadvantages of computer games, I would believe that its advantages outweigh its disadvantages in many aspects.

Today, the structures of computer games are so complicated that no one can finish the games unless to spend a couple of days. Large companies invested dramatically to send the games to market to compete with their rivals. In this ways, they consider ways to encourage parents to buy the games which are advantageous for their children in many ways. There are a lot of games designed to help children increase their sense of creativity and novelty. Some companies have also released games with educational-oriented aims. Existing such useful games, contradicts this statement that children should be prohibited playing computer games.

In addition, computer games are very efficient tools to entertain children as daily amusements. It goes without saying that many entertainments are very expensive for many poor families and children need to amuse themselves especially in summer when the schools are closed. The best way to entertain children is to buy a video game player. I remember that I was accustomed to play with my video game player, when I was a child. Without it, families should replace it by another entertainment may not be as cheap as video game players.

The underlying reason to criticize video games is that children spend a lot of time on playing. Parents complain that children replaced playing with computer games by studying their lessons. One point should be noted that everything in our today life can be double edged swear. If children be taught to how to use computer game and limit playing with it to a couple of hours per day, not only it will not be harmful, but also children can take the advantages of it.

To sum it up, it is not reasonable to deprive children of playing computer while this device is popular for every child. Instead, parent should regulate rules to restrict the hours children playing each day.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 ela87urb@gmail.com 3 view
2020-01-22 ela87urb@gmail.com 70 view
2020-01-22 ela87urb@gmail.com 66 view
2020-01-22 ela87urb@gmail.com 66 view
2020-01-05 Somayya 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user milad_pasand :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...market to compete with their rivals. In this ways, they consider ways to encourage p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to playing'.
Suggestion: accustomed to playing
...ideo game player. I remember that I was accustomed to play with my video game player, when I was a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98730964467 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8345481741 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507614213198 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8585782524 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3181818182 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.31818181818 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284409433705 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907885160341 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620033738542 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176174284992 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762619078863 0.0645574589148 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.