There is nothing that an uneducated person can teach an educated person. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Education is an important aspect in human’s life. Education can either be obtained from formal education institution, like schools or universities, or other people experience. Some people argue that uneducated people cannot teach educated person. However, in my opinion, uneducated people can still teach some other things that are not taught in education curriculum to educated people.
First, honesty is a personal character that can be taught outside schools. Anyone, including uneducated people, can teach the importance of being honest in daily life. Educated people may neglect this basic principle because of profit or social factor. Otherwise, uneducated people can show that honesty can bring many benefits, monetary and non-monetary, in people lives.
Second, uneducated people usually live in tougher living condition. Because of the limitation to education institution, they do not have adequate knowledge and soft skills to do corporate job. As a result, most of them work in jobs that depend mainly on hard skills, like carpenter or welder. Therefore, they can teach educated people how to do those hard-skilled jobs.
Third, uneducated people can teach about their origin culture. For example, they can teach their mother tongue language to foreign travelers. People in rural areas where access to education is limited can also teach domestic traditions, beliefs or rituals.
In conclusion, people who have limited access to education may not be able to teach sophisticated skills related to subjects in school’s curriculum, but they can share many important knowledge from their personal experience that can be useful for educated people.
- the insecticidal properties of DDT, a whit crystalline compound, were discovered in 1942. during world war II this pesticide was used to control the spread use of typhus and malaria. then in the postwar era it began to be used extensively as an agricultur 76
- Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying to future generations? 76
- Investigations made at laboratories in the various parts of the world indicate that apes are capable of understanding language and using linguistic responses at the level of young children. just because these animals do not have the physical apparatus for 80
- Salmon a fish prized for both food and sport has a complex life cycle After spending several years in the ocean adult salmon travel back to the freshwater streams where they were originally spawned to lay their eggs the females bury the eggs under the san 78
- Technology is available to exploit the potential energy formed by tides for the generation of electrical energy. The basic structure is a barrage or dam built across a river estuary or at the mouth of a bay. This dam is similar to that used in hydroelectr 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'cans'.
Suggestion: cans
... aspect in human's life. Education can either be obtained from formal educatio...
^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much important knowledge', 'a good deal of important knowledge'.
Suggestion: much important knowledge; a good deal of important knowledge
...l's curriculum, but they can share many important knowledge from their personal experience that can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, third, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 253.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.604743083 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8046925057 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3599264966 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.625 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272522192984 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103276655582 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578635501859 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166946998683 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627286812524 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.