A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Evidently, humans are the most intelligent creatures in this world,so humans have been killing animals since they evolved to satisfy their needs like food, clothing, fire etc. However, modern society feels that animals should not be killed anymore which is not right according to me.
Firstly, humans kill animals for imperative purposes, for instance animal's body parts are being used by Doctors to evolve new medicines and to cure some dangerous diseases which are essential for the survival of humans. If animals will not be killed than there population will get abundant which will be dangerous for both human and nature.
In addition, Scientists and doctors use to do their researches and tests on the animals, so they can find the flaws before applying that on humans. If they directly apply that on humans then it will lead to be a serious issue for the society. Eventually, these all are for the welfare of humans.
On the contrary, Due to over killing of animals , some species of animals are on endangered state and some of them have already been extinct which includes some beautiful species like stingray,so Humans are destroying the nature. We cannot ignore the fact that animals have feelings too and they are also a creation of god, so it so cruel to kill animals.
So it can be concluded, Despite the fact that animals have feelings, humans need to kill them for their own welfare and it is necessary for the survival of humans but they must avoid over killing of animals and killing of rare or endangered species to retain the beauty of our nature.
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 75
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 56
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- it has been proved that smoking kills. In some countries it has been made illegal for people to smoke in all public places except in certain areas. All countries should make these rules.Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Increase in the price of the petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic & pollution problems.To what extent do u agree or disagree?what other measures do u think might be effective? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , so
...most intelligent creatures in this world,so humans have been killing animals since ...
^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... In addition, Scientists and doctors use to do their researches and tests on the...
^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before applying that on humans. If they directly apply that on humans then it wi...
^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...contrary, Due to over killing of animals , some species of animals are on endanger...
^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , so
...des some beautiful species like stingray,so Humans are destroying the nature. We ca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, for instance, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8624535316 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40488757013 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524163568773 0.561755894193 93% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3157485289 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.8 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305678872551 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134808080673 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041581190027 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18500254749 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389320070806 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.