The article discuses the paintings that Rembrant painted and it claims that they are doubts that it was painted by him. But the professor challenges these points.
The first point that article makes is that the woman who was painted in Rembrants picture was not dressed properly. But, the professor, however says that the picture was not an original it was painted hundred years after the original came out and also she says the person who painted the copy wanted to increase the quality of the picture. She says that it was proved by doing some experimental X-rays.
The article also claims that there were some brightness mistakes in the picture and it also claims that Rembrant was a master of drawing shadows. However, the professor states that in the original picture the woman was wearing a simple light color collar that’s why the light seems wrong in the picture. And the professor also highlights that in the original picture the brightness is very realistic.
Finally, the article suggests that the picture was painted on a wooden panel glued together. Yet, the professor claims suggests that Rembrant painted on a single piece of wood, but after there were some additional panels added. And she also claims that the added part of the panel was matching with the old one.
The article discuses the paintings that Rembrant painted and it claims that they are doubts that it was painted by him. But the professor challenges these points.
The first point that article makes is that the woman who was painted in Rembrants picture was not dressed properly. But, the professor, however says that the picture was not an original it was painted hundred years after the original came out and also she says the person who painted the copy wanted to increase the quality of the picture. She says that it was proved by doing some experimental X-rays.
The article also claims that there were some brightness mistakes in the picture and it also claims that Rembrant was a master of drawing shadows. However, the professor states that in the original picture the woman was wearing a simple light color collar that’s why the light seems wrong in the picture. And the professor also highlights that in the original picture the brightness is very realistic.
Finally, the article suggests that the picture was painted on a wooden panel glued together. Yet, the professor claims suggests that Rembrant painted on a single piece of wood, but after there were some additional panels added. And she also claims that the added part of the panel was matching with the old one.
- The article discuses three theories that try to explain how the hydrogen can be used as a gasoline for cars. In the lecture, however, the professor challenges these claims. The first theory that the article makes is that the hydrogen is very common on the 60
- The article discuses the advantages of using and providing organic food. In the lecture, however, the professor challenges these claims.The first point that article makes is that organic foods are much better for human health, mainly because they do not c 73
- The article discuses the paintings that Rembrant painted and it claims that they are doubts that it was painted by him. But the professor challenges these points.The first point that article makes is that the woman who was painted in Rembrants picture was 60
- All over the world we lose natural resources, for example, water, trees, fuel and so on but, the most important resource is clean water. Without clean water there is no chance of living on Earth. And in my opinion, it’s a huge problem for everyone on Ea 70
- The article discusses the disadvantages of low wages. It also claims that minimum wages are effecting on businesses. In the lecture, however, the professor challenges these claims. The first point that the article makes is that minimum wages are affectin 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ture was not an original it was painted hundred years after the original came out and a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 219.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91780821918 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32702056449 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461187214612 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8598159573 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9090909091 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.62356201131 0.272083759551 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.263600820845 0.0996497079465 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.217293979677 0.0662205650399 328% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.448693477741 0.162205337803 277% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.233419764888 0.0443174109184 527% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 63.6247240618 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.