Some people think that genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
The number of countries growing genetically modified (GM) crops has increased in recent years causing much debate over the safety of these products. Some people arrogate that this technology will help those in the agricultural decrease the amount of wasted crops and foods. But while there are many benefits of GM crops, there are also potential drawbacks that present.
There is clear evidence that the use of GM crops has resulted in significant benefits. Firstly, they are promised higher yields and improved nutritional value. It has been easier to raise crops that are classified as genetically modified because all of their examples have the stronger ability to resist pests. This attribute helps famers with producing greater amounts of crops. Also, plants that have been genetically modified can become more nutritious in terms of vitamin or mineral contents. This not only helps people get the nutrients they need, but also plays a significant role in fighting against malnutrition in third-world countries. Furthermore, GM crops have been modified to make them more resistant to insects and other pests. This means the amount of pesticide chemicals used on the plants are reduced, so exposure to dangerous pesticides are also reduced.
On the other hand, it can also be argue that GM crops have had an adverse impact on our live. One big potential drawback of some GM crops have antibiotic features that are built into them, making them resistant or immune to viruses or diseases, as the result, creating super-weeds that have become impossible to kill. This threat to human health is a worrisome aspect that has received a great deal of debate. In addition, scientific studies have proven that GM crops contain substances that may cause diseases and even death to several kinds of spices in this word, including us humans. For instance, mice and butterflies cannot survive with these foods.
In conclusion, I think there is evidence to suggest that GM crops can potentially solve many hunger and malnutrition problems in the world, as well as help protect and preserve the environment by increasing yields and reducing reliance upon chemical pesticides and herbicides. However, it is important to proceed with caution to avoid unfavorable consequences for the surroundings and our heath.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-17 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 96 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | vaishali saral | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | vaishali saral | 67 | view |
- It is generally agreed that society benefits from the work of its members. Compare the contributions of artists to society with the contributions of scientists to society. Which type of contribution do you think is more valued by your society? Give specif 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly? 56
- Some people think that genetically modified GM crops are a positive development Others however argue that they are potentially dangerous Discuss both these views and give your opinion 74
- What is your opinion about the statement " Technology has made the world a better place to live". 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hunger seems to be countable; consider using: 'many hungers'.
Suggestion: many hungers
...est that GM crops can potentially solve many hunger and malnutrition problems in the world,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, third, well, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23783783784 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71492372099 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.58609088 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211176055883 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628495611434 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390986219904 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13272664223 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379176109993 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.