Mobile phones have changed the way many people communicate. Nowadays people cannot live without them if they want to be a part of society.
To what extent do you think this is true?
Why do you some people have not adapted to this type of communication?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
These days, the way lots of people connect to others is different from it in the past, due to mobile phones. It is impossible, as many people think, to not have this type of communication if we live in community. In my opinion, it is important for us to have mobile phones to communicate, it is, however, not the only way.
One the one hand, today, one of the most popular ways to contact is using mobile phones, since people can make phone calls, text and send messages and connect with others through social network such as Facebook, Twitter with their mobile phones. When people first meet, they often ask for phone numbers. It is the easiest way to keep in touch, because mobile phones are movable so we often have them with us wherever we go.
On the other hand, it is not imperative for us to have mobile phones when we live in society. There are still another ways to make connection. Many community members don’t have their own mobile phones, but they can contact to others by writing letters or sending email on computers, talking through telephones or having face-to-face conversations.
Some people, elderly for instance, usually communicate in those ways above instead of adapting to mobile phones. This may be because they cannot use them well, or they don’t want to be dependent on mobile phones, because many people who own this mean of communication become mobile-phone-addicts with their eyes sticking to the phone screen most of their time.
In conclusion, a mobile phone is very useful and convenient to connect in the age of technology, but we should not overuse them, as they can make us depend on them and less aware of other important things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-21 | dttt849200 | 65 | view |
- The chart compares average house prices in 5 different cities in the world from 1990 to 2002 with them in 1989. Units are measured in percentage. 73
- Mobile phones have changed the way many people communicate Nowadays people cannot live without them if they want to be a part of society To what extent do you think this is true Why do you some people have not adapted to this type of communication Give re 65
- The given table illustrates how consumers in 5 different countries spent their money on different items in 2002. Overall the figures in the table varied through the period. 73
- Some experts believe that is it better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Many people hold a view that children should be taught to be part community by their parents, while others would argue that it is better for them to learn this at school. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78006872852 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.665280222 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4923864019 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.916666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318835416922 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135020687483 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835148612493 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195014102397 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890610685862 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.