The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general welfare of all its people
There have been various indicators present to mark the development of the country as a whole. But is there any universal indicator present to indicate the development? Well the answer is yes. Now, usuallly it is considered that the more country is reknowned the more developed and independent it is. A country can grow to fame just by a few inventions (by research) and having the origin of some great litreature. We can clearly see that such a prediction is really based on some baseless evidence.
A good indicator is the one that takes into account the whole population of the country and then compares. There could be a case in which the country has produced some fine talents in any one particular field but lacks in all other respects. For instance, the economic diversity in the country is very high, such that the rich litreally rule over the poor, causing more economic imbalance. In such nations, the only result is that the rich become more richer and the poor become poorer, further leading to corruption and cases like that. Such a nation isn't a happy nation.
Another intance of a similar aspect could be the division on the basis of race and caste. Such a nation is not utilizing the potential present in its citizens. All people aren't being offered an equal oppurtiunity and favouritism is present in the country. This is not at all an indication of a great nation.
Some good indicators can be per capita income of the people (stating if they are able to sustain themselves or not) and the hapiness factor. Recently a study based on the hapiness of the people, declared Bangladesh as the happiest country in the world. It is a fact to be appreciated that even though with low levels of GDP and per capita income the maximum population is happy. Could they be called a great nation?
Achievements of a few citizens will surely land the nation among great standing but we need to ask the quesion, is it fair to strip the people off of their rights and concenterate just on a few people. Is it fair of us to uplift the already uplifted at the cost of the people's basic necessities and requirements? The answer is no. A great nation can only be defined if it develops as a whole. Every citizen of the country should be aware of their findamental rights and duties and follow them without any question.
The point is that for any nation to develop the nost priority should be given to the upliftment of the lower communities. The focus should be on the general level of the people. And thus, this should be considered as a valid indicator.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-01-27 | Anshul5896 | 66 | view |
- "Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time." 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general welfare of all its people 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general welfare of all its people 66
- Important truths begin as outrageous or at least uncomfortable attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...untry has produced some fine talents in any one particular field but lacks in all other...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'richer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: richer
...the only result is that the rich become more richer and the poor become poorer, further lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 553, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...tion and cases like that. Such a nation isnt a happy nation. Another intance of a s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ial present in its citizens. All people arent being offered an equal oppurtiunity and...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ady uplifted at the cost of the peoples basic necessities and requirements? The answer is no. A g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, then, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61538461538 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59760881376 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49010989011 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6467288807 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7777777778 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8518518519 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176388659366 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512598706083 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602779123689 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921017928604 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585770382558 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.