The map below is of the town of Gartsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town, The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied map represents the town of Garlsdon. The map shows the two possible sites for the supermarket, as planned for the town. The first potential town is in countryside and another is in town centre.
As it is observed from the map, the town Garlsdon has a population of well nigh 65000. In the north and south of town, industrial area is located. The first viable site is in between main roads and railways. The first possible site for supermarket is quite far from industry but it is near to housing. This site is roughly near to the individuals of Hindson in contrast to the individuals of Bransdon and Cransdon.
At the outer side of town, there is a countryside in a rectangular shape. In the centre of the town, there is a town centre without any traffic zone. The second potential spot for supermarket is in town centre. The second site is well nigh to railways. The population of Cransdon, which is 29000, is 25 km away from second site. The masses of Bransdon, which is 15000, is 16 km away from second viable site.
While analysing overall, the second spot is near to railways, all main roads and industry in contrast to the first potential site.
- The diagram below shows information about member attendance at various clubs in a metro city. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. Write a report for university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- The diagram below shows information about member attendance at various clubs in a metro city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 96
- The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. Write a report for university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.Write a report 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e supermarket, as planned for the town. The first potential town is in countryside ...
^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'house'?
Suggestion: house
...ite far from industry but it is near to housing. This site is roughly near to the indiv...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e second site is well nigh to railways. The population of Cransdon, which is 29000,...
^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 29000, is 25 km away from second site. The masses of Bransdon, which is 15000, is ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, well, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61244019139 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59518990545 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435406698565 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2315091705 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.2666666667 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.9333333333 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333751375253 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134396633409 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148213787867 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230957217257 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165242707427 0.0819641961636 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.