It is generally accepted that families are not as close as they used to be.
Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.
Include any relevant examples from your experience.
Socialization becomes a concern these days as it is believed that the technology isolates people and restricts them from socializing.
Firstly, if we consider the mobile phones and internet, these play an important role in separating families or even dividing each family member from their family. Today almost everything is available on the internet and we do not even have to step out of home to buy our groceries. In such case, people tend to check what is happening in their families by giving a phone call or browsing through social networks such as Facebook.
In addition, everybody's life becomes so busy and we find less time to spend with family. People run behind their targets at job to save some more money for their future generation. This leads to work overtime on weekends or holidays. Hence no time to think of visiting their families on a weekend.
Therefore, we can come up with a few solutions to make the families get together. For example, my husband and I planned our wedding in an off peak season so that all our relatives who live all over the world could attend it, which was successful. Likewise, people can at least try to attend family functions which will be a pleasant get together. Further, parents can use their children's school holidays to visit their grandparents and stay with them throughout the leave period. This will not only connect families but also help to get rid of the busy life and relax for some days.
In conclusion, if there is will there is a way. Accordingly, people should make an effort to allocate time for family get together. Lets not allow the technology or our machine life style to contribute in separating the families. Whatever said and done, in our older age it will only be our family who will look after us, not the money we saved or the latest computer we bought.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Mostafaasadi | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | Biren | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | harsha.annapureddy@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | gt1709 | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | Javeriya | 56 | view |
- today the life expectancy of people is much higher than before Some people think that older people should continue to be involved in the workforce to what extent do u agree or disagree 67
- The tables show results of 2 surveys done in 1980 and 2010 on various aspects of city living in a particular city Units are measured in percentage Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 81
- today the life expectancy of people is much higher than before Some people think that older people should continue to be involved in the workforce to what extent do u agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... work overtime on weekends or holidays. Hence no time to think of visiting their fami...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... allocate time for family get together. Lets not allow the technology or our machine...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, likewise, look, so, therefore, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73208722741 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54528382216 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588785046729 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.635020293 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3529411765 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149462421557 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048131072571 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405127058179 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764742786796 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356495742631 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.