Some people hold a view that high school students must do community work as a mandatory part of their study program.
Some people hold a view that high school students must do community work as a mandatory part of their study program. In my opinion, it is necessary for them to contribute to the community, however, these kinds of activites should not be compulsory.
On the one hand, since students are part of society, it is their responsibilities to help others who are struggling with their lives. Doing this kind of service not only helps students understand more about the community in which they live but also helps them gain lifeexperiences and decreases the distanceamong different classes. It is a good way for them to be atributed to the society.
On the other hand, I would argue that community service should not be compulsory to every student, as some of them may also have difficulties, for example, physical disabilities or financial issues, which doesn’t allow them to partcipate in these activities. Moreover, since it is called ‘community service’, in other words it is ‘voluntary work’, students should not be forced to do this but make their own decisions. I pesonally believe that teachers should let their students organize their own projects that aim to help people and support them with their activites, withoutimposing any rules or demands on them.
In conclusion, although serving the society is important to students, when it comes to ‘compulsory programme’, it should be considered carefully under the personal circumtances of all students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-09 | dttt849200 | 84 | view |
- Mobile phones have changed the way many people communicate Nowadays people cannot live without them if they want to be a part of society To what extent do you think this is true Why do you some people have not adapted to this type of communication Give re 65
- Some people hold a view that high school students must do community work as a mandatory part of their study program. 84
- The given table illustrates how consumers in 5 different countries spent their money on different items in 2002. Overall the figures in the table varied through the period. 73
- Many people hold a view that children should be taught to be part community by their parents, while others would argue that it is better for them to learn this at school. 78
- The chart compares average house prices in 5 different cities in the world from 1990 to 2002 with them in 1989. Units are measured in percentage. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 5.60731707317 589% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32203389831 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33853132968 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2158572512 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.555555556 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2222222222 5.23603664747 272% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318829558316 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168666387623 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.298392482215 0.0843802449381 354% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222279709384 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.228766662367 0.0819641961636 279% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.