It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for
a high proportion of young people. Do you agree or disagree?
That more college campuses are built to creat more chances for the youth has controversial. It is believed that this policy is both impractical and inefficient. I completely agree with this point. This essay will discuss about the disadvantages of giving higher education for high percentage of youngsters.
To begin with, it is impossible to provide almost young people with acess to universities. First and foremost, it is not enough space to build more college places. For example, in Viet Nam, most of universities are located in the big cities such as Ha Noi, Ho Chi Minh. They are areas where are always crowed with people, so constructing universities campus is not ability. Moreover, to build additional colleges, government must spend more money on hiring lectures and founding institutions of higher education while this is not really essential.
Besides, widespread into university does not seem really useful for both economy and learners. The first advantage is that the quality of teaching can go down dramatically. More universities are founder, more lectures need to be hired whereas the number of people who have knowledge and experiences enough to teach is limited. In addition, if all of youth including students who do not pass the test of national go to college, it will be not equal for people who study hard. With people who do not intention to attend the curriculum in university, they can apprentice and this is better for both them and the national economy.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the idea of supplying the huge of university campuses for young people because of negative affections listed below.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-15 | mr.cuong95 | 61 | view |
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- IN SOME COUNTRIES PEOPLE ARE NOT TAKING CARE OF THEIR ELDERLY RELATIVES SOME BELIEVE THAT THE ELDERLY PEOPLE SHOULD LIVE IN NURSING HOME WHERE TRAINED PROFESSIONAL CARE For THE ELDERLY OTHERS THINK THEY SHOULD LIVE WITH THE YOUNGER FAMILY MEMBERS DISCUSS 84
- 9.In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think that more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 73
- 3.The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1908 and 2010 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the universities') or simply say ''most universities''.
Suggestion: most of the universities; most universities
...llege places. For example, in Viet Nam, most of universities are located in the big cities such as H...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, moreover, really, so, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13382899628 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86879035947 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583643122677 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1736383734 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159868195204 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508792611452 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395102603155 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989826899424 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194591916571 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.