Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
There are several reasons why governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today. Primarily, every country has a plethora of pressing issues where many people’s lives are at stake. Such problems must be solved immediately and without delay. In addition, it can be very difficult to accurately anticipate the problems of the future. Therefore, the government should turn their attention toward the problems of today rather than to attempt to solve anticipated problems of the future.
Firstly, countries are faced with many significant, complex issues that affect the lives of their citizens. For every second that wasted, another individual suffers from the effects of discrimination, poverty, malnourishment, and other basic needs. One only needs to turn on the TV for a few minutes to see stories of police brutality, homelessness, and rioting. If the government focuses on solving these pressing issues, they can influence a generation of people who can build society up for the coming future.
Secondly, anticipating problems of the future is an elusive task. No one can accurately predict the future with 100 percent certainty. Although some highly educated individuals may have the inchoate inklings of a general direction, it is impossible for anyone to fathom specific details about the future. Due to the fallibility of anticipation, a government can easily make a poor decision when trying to solve a future problem. One example of this was the American attack on Iraq after the September 11th terrorist bombings. The USA had thought that Iraq had developed “weapons of mass destruction.” In an attempt to preemptively prevent a large scale war, the America decided to invade this Middle Eastern country. However, to this day, none of these weapons were ever discovered.
Although it is important for governments to solve the problems of today, completely neglecting any anticipated problems can also be detrimental to a nation. When devising a remedy to any issue, government officials must consider the consequences to the best of their ability. Most often, it is better to have a permanent solution that carries well into the future rather than a temporary, “band-aid” type of answer. For example, when fighting discrimination in the United States, the Supreme Court issuing an order of “separate but equal” rather than integrating both races only served to fuel racial tensions. This tensionculminated in the Dr. King era, where many more riots and fights occurred. Therefore, although a country must focus on the problems of today, their solutions must consider the effects well into the future.
In conclusion, a government should focus primarily on the problems that it faces today. Since many of these important issues are time-sensitive, a nation has the duty to assist its current citizens in having a better life immediately. In addition, many of the future problems cannot be anticipated with any degree of accuracy. Therefore, a country should focus its effort of the problems of today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- Teachers salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students 38
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 58
- In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 66
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2594.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38174273859 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12294077399 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53112033195 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.740449438202 405% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7850734699 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7692307692 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73076923077 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462796763003 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135398569909 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164570122226 0.0758088955206 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273139936111 0.150359130593 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189585203557 0.0667264976115 284% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.