The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, the entrepreneurship of cars should be limited which is one per family for decrease the traffic jam and pollution. However, the vehicles and travellers re raising compared to past, due to the development of advanced technology. If these consequences may occurs some diseases also harmful for human's health. Hence, it should be restricted.
Admittedly, I completely agree with this concept. There are certain preventive measures to control the hiring of own cars and other vehicles. Firstly, the tax should be exalted and keep more rules and regulations under by government system. Moreover, most of the people they are chosen to use other transporting systems instead of using their own cars. As a result, in case of roads the traffic block and pollution may eradicate a little. Secondly, expenditure of fuel sources prizes should be increased. Subsequently, because of this is protect the public from pollution or other pollutants such as fogs and gases which are largely affected for their body. For instance, in Uttar Pradesh the petroleum prize is gradually topper rather than other materials, due to that nowadays the pollution becoming less on that area.
Evidently, what makes the people protection from harmful environment, obviously the driving license test may keep some renovated techniques and dictums in order to ensure the road would be free from threats. Although, these menaces fosters the people get affected with some diseases such as respiratory tract infections and heart diseases. Furthermore, the accidents are arises which leads to death of the people sometimes major injuries as resulted. Thus, the society became low economic level and they are failure to achieve their notion. To be specific, recently one of the church priest passed away due to the road rush or accident indeed, the family is not getting proper as before so the government has given some financial help to such family.
Having said that, not only the cars other four wheelers should be restricted which is one in each family. However, this paradigm may acts as a conscience for living life. Hence, the number of cars should be controlled for stagnating the circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-06 | Jason Pappachan | 89 | view |
- Nowadays all new town planning should include public parks shopping malls and sports facilities Do you agree or disagree 96
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008 56
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and eduction. Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizen themselves? 78
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 39
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'protected'.
Suggestion: protected
...eased. Subsequently, because of this is protect the public from pollution or other poll...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23931623932 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75163237933 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60113960114 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7169552792 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.95 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.55 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19802267163 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598901808126 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786899490008 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131132105344 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586084509199 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.