Should higher fuel price?
In the threshold of the new era, an increasing number of people are concerned about green issues more than ever. Therefore, whether the government should increase the tax on petrol is a highly debated conversation. My view is that its price should definitelt be elevated.
It is irrefutable that an enormous number of vehicles would pull out toxic emission that flattened the atmosphere, which cause the global warming. In this regard, a huge amount of smog that comes from these automobiles might focus at one point in the air, worsen the environmental problems and the air quality. Accordingly, if the authorities increase if the government increases the affordable price of petrol, there would be less frequently used means of transport and solving the polluted atmosphere as well. Furthermore, by raising the cost people would not use their car to travel for a short distance like go to work or go to school which could lessen the toxic gas and encourage citizens to use public transportation as well. Thus, the idea that the authorities lifting gas taxes should be launched as soon as possible.
Having said that, despite its obvious benefits, raising petrol prices also poses threats in varied level. Particulary, those whose works depend mostly on cars like drivers, of course would confront massive spending on gasoline. Not to mention that those working as drivers could be breadwinner and must raise family as a whole. Nevertheless, day-to-day life may probably be adjusted.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that governments and local authorities should lift the gasoline cost as soon as possible so that the pollution problems could be releaved. By doing so, we firmly sure that we and the next generation will no longer suffer from unqualified air.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-16 | tmlong2000 | 89 | view |
- consumers are faced with increasing number of advertisments from conpeting companies. to what extent do you think are consumers influenced bay advertisments? what can be done to protect them? 56
- 1.Some people say that the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums. Other argues that they should spend more money on medical care and education. Discuss both view 89
- advantages of cars? 89
- increase petrol tax in order to decrease traffic and pollution. Do you agree? 56
- aaaaaaa 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81296292487 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4818977321 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10736119775 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419062710715 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605719993195 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708439143806 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467238465595 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.