The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe. The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries.
The chart illustrates the unemployment level in Italy, Germany and Spain in the year 1991 to 2005, while the table provides data on the employment proportion of men and women in three European countries in 1991.
Overall, it is evident that Spain has the highest unemployment rate among the three countries for almost a decade. In addition, Spaniards has the lowest employment level in 1991 within the nation mentioned.
In 1991, Spain has the top rating of unemployment with 13%increasing markedly at 18% in 1993 to 1995, and then the trend dropped reaching its lowest rate at 9% in 2005. Italians who are jobless was relevantly steady starting at 8% in 1991 and slowly rising reaching as high as 12% in 1997 to 1999 and then dropping gradually back at 8% again in 2005. In contrast, Germany started at 4% in 1991 and increasing gradually reaching 9% in 1997 and reaching over 10% margin after 2004.
The employment rate of men in three different countries in 1991 was significantly higher in comparison to women. Italy has the highest proportion of men working with 77.1% and Germany has the most number of working female with 54.4%. Germany has the highest employment rate with the percentage of male and female combined.
- More and more prisons are being built to house the world s criminals and many people believe long term imprisonment is the answer to solving the crime problem However others feel that psychological assistance is what is required Discuss both views and giv 80
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think that this is a positive or negative development 52
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries 82
- The chart below show the average wages over of managerial and general staff and the profits of the company TRN between 2000 and 2003. 84
- Economic growth and development are usually considered to be beneficial both for individuals and for society as a whole What are some advantages and disadvantages of economic development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91387559809 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69600136164 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516746411483 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9576936766 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.111111111 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245102723794 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114879647692 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993525201356 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166740226906 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638724639391 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.