TPO 20
In the reading passage, the author claims that "let it burn" policy, which allows forest fires continue burning without human interfering to extinguish it, render the environment damaged() by pointing out three reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and states that "let it burn" rule is not only destructive, but it also is constructive many times which demonstrated that indeed it is a good regulation.
At first, the author argues that diminishing the vegetation is one of the primitive adverse ramification of this policy. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that scorching has created the suitable environment for other plants to colonize in that place. Actually, diversification in plants occurs after each fire since other species take this opportunity to grow. For instance, having found more unshaded space, the small plants can nurture well. In addition, take the Yellowstone fire as an example. There were a lot of seeds that require heat to germinate. Admittedly, if this fire had not happened, the seeds would not have bred.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that wildlife undergone a severe decline in various animal species. On the other hand, the professor disputes this point by clarifying that as of inhabiting the small plants, a lot of small animals such as rabbits and hairs are tempting to live there. Subsequently, their predators will attract to the new environment as well. As a matter of fact, they produce a new life cycle and food chain which is undoubtedly far stronger than it was before the fire.
Finally, the author asserts that the presence of fire in such location can end up with a substantial drop in the number of visitors. The professor, thought, dismisses this idea by subscribing to the point that this will happen if the fire repeats frequently, but the Yellowstone fire has not happened after 1988. Besides, such economy disaster requires that fire becomes companion to other factors such as the considerable lack of rain and severe winds. Thus, coming back again after that fire regularly, people promote the tourism industry in that region.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
- TPO 28- integrated writing - Peary's trip to the North Pole 85
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill. 90
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16850828729 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79365912424 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 145.348785872 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588397790055 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5250384289 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.058823529 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248829295122 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714871554537 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429054396265 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135786063505 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030833884595 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 63.6247240618 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.