Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person's nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many people consider that bad inborn characters are reason leading to crime problems. While I accept that crime issues may come from individual characteristics of violence of greed, I would argue that the crime is derived from social problems and poverty.
On the one hand, people believe that a person's nature determines whether or not they become a criminal. Firstly, some bad characters such as laziness or irresponsibility might breed future offenders. For example, the large number of youngsters who choose to prefer to enjoy life rather than working hard to make an honest living. Secondly, the minority of people have the bias in favor of rapacious. Consequently, criminals are willing to find various ways to improve the quality of life by making easy money through illegal activities which are even cheating poor people. There are strong reasons for thinking that those who have an innate bad nature are more likely to break the law.
On the other hand, it seems to me that social issues and poverty are the main causes which lead to increase in crime rate in society. Firstly, social problems easily create crime. For instance, the rising rate of young offenders in recent years is related to domestic violence which stems from the education of members in families. The responsibility of families play an indispensable part in the growth of individual personality so if children have to witness violence in their families, they more likely to turn to crime in the future. Secondly, social condition as poverty in general also leads to a rise in crime. For example, if they do not have enough money to make ends meet. As a result, they easily commit a crime than others because of the lack of awareness about laws. They resort to crime to get money for supporting themselves and their family.
In conclusion, while others think bad human nature is responsible for crime, it seems to me that the principal causes of crime are a result of social condition and problems
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-05-09 | sonchip96hb | 91 | view |
2017-05-09 | sonchip96hb | 73 | view |
2017-04-20 | theresa_trangnguyen | 67 | view |
2017-01-20 | xun | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 67
- Some people think that the government should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country development and progress What extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport why is it not popular in many places? How to increase its popularity 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... On the one hand, people believe that a persons nature determines whether or not they b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...elieve that a persons nature determines whether or not they become a criminal. Firstly, some b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94311377246 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62879196003 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547904191617 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3919316838 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1176470588 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284007226016 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927399061107 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080634641181 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19805570713 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078777903253 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.