Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in 10 years a company has developed satellite technology that has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current satellite provider. The company is Techcorporation. A consumer survey last year indicated that over eighty percent of respondents were dissatisfied with their current satellite provider and would want to switch to another provider if the industry were not a monopoly Techcorporation will be highly profitable for those who choose to invest now.
In the newsletter, the author offers seemlying solid, convicing advice to invest in the Techcorporation for providing satellite technology to consumers. He states that the overwhelming majority of people are ready to switch providers, but have no other option. The information provided leaves many gaps for investors in the decision making process on whether to invest or not.
The first question that investors must ask is, what can Techcorporation provide that the leading company is not? For consumers to switch services there must be a deciding factor that makes the switch worth it. This factor must benefit the consumer in a way that makes their satellite service more enjoyable. This factor must also keep them from switching back to their previous supplier if they are not satisfied. Without this difference the new company would not succeed and in gaining customers. If Techcorporation does not offer services that the leading company does not, there would be no reason for investing in the company.
Another questions that investors must ask is, what areas will Techcorporation cover? If Techcorporation covers the exact same ground as the leading supplier, they may struggle getting customers. If they can expand their business beyond the ground covered by the other company, they would have more exposure to people from surrounding areas. This would create business growth and would be more encourage for investors to make the decision to fund the company.
Finally, the investors must ask, how was the survey distributed and where? The newsletter states that eighty percent of respondents were dissatisfied with their current satellie provider and would want to switch to another provider if given the chance. Although this is an impactful number that would help recieve investors, this survey may have been effected by bias or confounders based on the area that the survey was distributed. If one area recieves better satellite reception than another, the data results may be skewed. The survey should be conducted again using appropriate research methods with precautions taken against bias. The resulting data may give investors an enhanced view of the demand for a new satellite provider.
The newsletter seems swayed toward the encouragement of investing. Investors, without properly researching and asking questions may be convinced to invest in a company with no future. Without asking these questions, one can not make an educated decision on whether or not to invest in the new Techcorporation company.
- The following appeared as part of the petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group.“The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve. This sanctuary is 66
- sports stars and movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them. In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid, we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility. 83
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 58
- Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in 10 years a company has developed satellite technology that has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current s 66
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to get'.
Suggestion: to get
...the leading supplier, they may struggle getting customers. If they can expand their bus...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...emand for a new satellite provider. The newsletter seems swayed toward the enco...
^^^
Line 9, column 258, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ne can not make an educated decision on whether or not to invest in the new Techcorporation co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.9520958084 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 399.0 441.139720559 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35839598997 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84986762261 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 204.123752495 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508771929825 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.471057884232 637% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1511095858 57.8364921388 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.1818181818 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1363636364 23.324526521 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.70786347227 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211931718841 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655503059967 0.0743258471296 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504632563926 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125546396023 0.128457276422 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352326227216 0.0628817314937 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.5979740519 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 98.500998004 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.