The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.(Study Sample)
The chart shows male and female fitness membership over a thirty-year period. The vertical axis represents the number of members. The horizontal axis represents the period from 1970 to 2000.
<!--break-->
Overall, the chart indicates that there were greater fluctuations in fitness membership among men than among women. The number of male members started the period at just over two thousand and reached highs of four thousand in 1975 and five thousand around 1995. The lowest rates were in 1985 and more recently in 2000 when the rate dipped as low as one thousand.
Female fitness membership began lower at one thousand, doubled by 1975, and then fluctuated between two and three thousand for the remainder of the period. When male rates were at their lowest, female rates were higher. This was particularly true in 1985 when over three thousand women held fitness membership.
In brief, there were marked differences in rates of male and female fitness memberships in the period covered
- You have a friend who lives in a city abroad. You have decided that you would like to apply to do a course at one of the colleges in this city.Write to your friend explaining what you would like to do. Tell him/her what type of work or studies you have be 80
- the amount of four different meats 60
- Televised talent shows have become popular in many societies today.Are these shows a good method of finding talented people, or are they just entertainment? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien 43
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 55
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problemsTo what extend do you agree and disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective ? 70
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.89 7.5
No. of Different Words: 84 100
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 161 200
No. of Characters: 800 1000
No. of Different Words: 84 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.562 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.969 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.412 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 55 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 38 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.89 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.2 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.437 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.653 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4