The ownership of car should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Due to problem of traffic congestion and environment pollution, there should be one car for each house, I completely agree with this. These days due to easily available finance option with relaxed criteria thorough banks as well as installment plans offered by car dealerships have enabled households to buy multiple vehicles. However, because infrastructure & road network has limited capacity and this has increased number of problems.
Traffic congestion is a problem faced by almost every person driving an automobile. Due to number of vehicles available in each family, every person of the family moves around in their own car even if they are to go to same place. We notice that number of vehicles are moving around with just single passenger. As road network has a limited capacity, this increases traffic on road. Routes are being choked during rush hours of mornings & evenings when people are travelling to & fro from their workplaces respectively.
Another problem is environment pollution. With each car, there is more use of fuel & thus more combustion which in turns results in increased emission of dangerous gases in environment. Notable gases among those are carbon monoxide (CO) which is very dangerous. These gases contaminate the air humans breathe in and thus this results in not just environment pollution but deteriorated health of living beings as well.
The best way to overcome this problem is through restrictions of owning one vehicle for each household. Carpooling is very common these days where people going to same place share vehicle. They can do so instead of travelling in individual cars. Besides carpooling, people can use public transport, it will not only help financially troubled public transport sector but will also create a competition which in turn will improve quality of these vehicles as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-07 | dalexphilips | 89 | view |
- ARGUMENT:"An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East Meria, where fish consumption is very high, people visit the doctor only once 60
- Some people choose a career according to the social status and salary it will give them. Others choose a career according to whether they will enjoy the work. So which do you think is the best way to choose career.Give reasons for your answers and include 78
- Some people choose a career according to the social status and salary it will give them. Others choose a career according to whether they will enjoy the work.Which do you think is the best way to choose a career? Give reasons for your answer and include a 56
- Advertising discourages people from being different individuals by making us all want to do the same. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 40
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28231292517 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77992742471 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.647427462 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119173463678 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411552368134 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559853815266 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714732557806 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340595808028 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.