The following appeared as part of an article in an entertainment magazine:
"A series of books based on the characters from a popular movie are consistently best sellers in local bookstores. Seeking to capitalize on the books' success, Vista Studios is planning to produce a movie sequel based on the books. Due to the success of the books and the original movie, the sequel will undoubtedly be profitable."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
Write the essay now!
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-07-25 | ShivaniPatel | view |
- The following appeared in the opinion section of a national newsmagazine:"To reverse the deterioration of the postal service, the government should raise the price of postage stamps. This solution wi
- The following appeared in an article in a travel magazine After the airline industry began requiring airlines to report their on time rates Speedee Airlines achieved the number one on time rate with more than 89 percent of its flights arriving on time eac 80
- The following appeared in an article in a consumer products magazine Two of today s best selling brands of full strength prescription medication for the relief of excess stomach acid Acid Ease and Pepticaid are now available in milder nonprescription form 70
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the president of a company that makes shampoo:"A widely publicized study claims that HR2, a chemical compound in our shampoo, can contribute to hair loss a
- The following is part of a business plan being discussed at a board meeting of the Perks Company:"It is no longer cost-effective for the Perks Company to continue offering its employees a generous pa