More and more people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with their
families and friends. Why does this happen? What are the effects on family and society as a
whole.
Recent decades witnessed a steep rise in the proportion of individuals overloaded with work, reducing the amount of time spent for family and friends. Given that this pattern could be attributed to many social factors, the impacts associated with family and society could be pronounced.
There are many reasons leading to this trend. First, career prospects with high possibilities of bigger promotion could be conducive to individuals’ higher level of work commitment and dedication, thereby leading the decrease in the amount of time for family as well as friends. Second, the pressure from employers forces people to devote time to finish the allocated work ahead of the deadline, minimising the time for other personal activities. Otherwise, the likelihood of docking payment or even dismissal is inevitable.
Nonetheless, it should be acknowledged that this patten could be fraught with many pitfalls pertaining to families and society. First, spending less time for a family could culminate in the misunderstanding and internal conflicts between family members. Therefore this could deteriorate the family bonding, pushing parents to the verge of divorce. In addition, overloaded with work could be instrumental in some mental disorders from stress and frustration, acting as a deterrent for couples from embracing parenthood. This would adversely affect the future workforce stemming from the lack of young population, fueling the economic downturn of the country.
In conclusion, this trend could come from many social aspects varying from career prospects and employers’ pressure. Additionally, people should undertake some initiatives to guarantee the work-life balance for the sake of family and themselves overall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-13 | grahamoneil | 56 | view |
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens 78
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to the modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ernal conflicts between family members. Therefore this could deteriorate the family bondi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74903474903 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04465065098 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579150579151 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0530259575 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.538461538 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21036851142 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795369470034 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456159426878 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142318859505 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451041835227 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.