The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company.
"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack o awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should, therefore, allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
The author's claim that the reason for the smaller audience at the movie screenings of the Super Screen Movie Production company is the smaller share of the company's budget towards advertisement is based on highly overrated assumptions. Further probing into the matter via more dependable audience is required for better clarification.
The diminishing audience at the movies can be due to a motley of factors. The primary one being increase in the hegemony of piracy or duplicity which aids in the individuals to get the viewable prints of the movies even before they are released in the theatres or in the form of DVDs or other legal external storage drives. This needs to be probed into with the help of the crime investigation departments of the area. Another viable possibility is the improving standard of living among the residents of a particular area resulting in them buying more and more home theatres and other luxury movie viewing accouterments. Thereby, they are engaging in mass movie viewing or screening at their homes with their neighbors and friends. Thus, less number of DVDs are being sold.
Another alternative point of view can be that the movies being produced are highly artistic and turgid which limits their lucidity to the common masses. Such movies gain wide acclaim from the reviewers or critics roundly but. are not appreciated to a considerable extent by the audience. It may be possible that the audience indulges in watching commercial movies which are not based on an abstruse concept.
Nonetheless, one also needs to understand that the scope and credibility of the movie reviews being mentioned by the author can also be called to question. It is possible that the sample of movie reviewers being considered are biased towards the Super screen movie production company. The only way to find the actual predilection of the viewers in question is to conduct a disinterested door-to-door survey where a concise set o questions shall determine the actual reason for the unfavorable viewers' discretion towards Super Screen Movie Production company or the movies produced by them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
... based on highly overrated assumptions. Further probing into the matter via more depend...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
...m the reviewers or critics roundly but. are not appreciated to a considerable exten...
^^^
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'viewers'' or 'viewer's'?
Suggestion: viewers'; viewer's
...e the actual reason for the unfavorable viewers discretion towards Super Screen Movie P...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 2260.96107784 79% => OK
No of words: 345.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14492753623 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79948985661 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527536231884 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1762465723 57.8364921388 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73333333333 5.70786347227 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2082148108 0.218282227539 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697426282236 0.0743258471296 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736588326512 0.0701772020484 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132000052641 0.128457276422 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044252567741 0.0628817314937 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 98.500998004 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.