the pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
The charts compare four retail sections in Canada in terms of the proportion of their internet sales in two years, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, the proportion of online sales for each of the four sectors saw significant changes from 2005 to 2010. It is also clear that while food and beverage and video games had upward trends, the percentages for the other sectors decreased over the period.
In 2005, food and beverage accounted for 22% of online sales, the figure increased by 10% in 2010, making it the highest among the sectors. Likewise, although video games had the lowest online sales in 2005, 18%, the percentage went up to 23% in 2010.
In contrast, the figures for both the other sectors fell. Particularly, there was a dramatic fall in the internet sales for the home furnishing sector, from 25% in 2005 to only 15% in 2010, which meant that this figure was the lowest at the end. The proportion for electronics and appliances had a smaller decrease, by 5% from the 2005 figure of 35%.
- what are the advantages and disadvantages for children of TV? 56
- the graph below gives info about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 67
- This chart shows the top eight destination for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5000 couples 70
- The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69714285714 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41318825437 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1370086234 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394549906934 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176180839974 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780321001975 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245917447588 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312923329756 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.