using vessels as electric batteries in ancient times
The reading and the lecture both discuss evidence which is related to using vessels as electric batteries in ancient times. The author of the reading believes that there are no proofs which support this claim. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the author. She thinks that documents which are presented in the reading are not convincing.
First of all, the author points out that the vessel does not use for batteries. It is mentioned that there is no attachment between these materials and electric conductors. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that vessels were discovered by local people near the jars. These people were not trained like an archeologist, and they would not able to recognize these materials exactly, so we will not know surely about the wires and conductors.
Secondly, the author contends that archeologists found some copper cylinders belong to Seleucia which they were used for holding scroll texts. The article notes that these materials were similar to jars which are discovered at Iraq in ancient times, so these materials had analogous employments. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that it is true that there is a resemblance between these cylinders, but were not reported any proofs for using vessels for scroll and there is just a possible. She elaborates on this by mentioning that vessels may first be designed to scroll; then, people knew that by adding iron red and liquid they could produce electricity. In other words, vessels originally were used for one goal then they adopt to employ for another purpose.
Finally, the author states that those people did not have any devices which relied on electric batteries. The article establishes that these vessels were useless for them. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that batteries could make mild shock, and it was very well as a visible power. She puts forth the idea that people could apply this power for healing and other medical purposes. In fact, in modern medicine, mild shocks are utilized for stimulating muscles and mitigating some pains, so ancient people could have these purposes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-23 | Raed Mudawar | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Raed Mudawar | 71 | view |
- decreasing population of yellow cedar trees 68
- In today’s world, it is very important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than works slowly and make sure that everything is correct 76
- remains of actual animal tissues in T.rex fossils 61
- using vessels as electric batteries in ancient times 76
- Some scientists believe that students under the age of 12 should have different teachers every day like the students who are between 12-18 years old. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...surely about the wires and conductors. Secondly, the author contends that arche...
^^^^
Line 5, column 742, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...inally were used for one goal then they adopt to employ for another purpose. Finally...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, in fact, first of all, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 353.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08498583569 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45830660268 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524079320113 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4874679873 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.75 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206377750298 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662537514011 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906974915616 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13436046308 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325955262796 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.