Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position
The statement states that the nations around the world should preserve the nature and wilderness areas in their current state even if it costs us development. This statement assumes that development is correlated with infrastucture which can only be achieved by displacing the forests and wilderness areas by concrete jungles, which is actually not true as a development in it true sence means taking care of your surroundings in which you live as well.
Although the infrastucture development is equally neccessary for a growing economy to support its ever growing demands for new areas but it should not be done at the cost of our nature and forest areas, our growing demands have already vanished a lot of forest area in order to support our growing population and its demands but if this continues to happen at the same rate then it will result in some serious problems resulting form global warming to natural calamaties.
On the other hand deforestation in the past costs the wild life a great deal in the endangering many species and vanished a lot of them. Wild life is a also essential to support the ecosystem we live in, without them this ecosystem will fall apart which will ultimatly threatens human as well.
Therefore there is a strict need for this policy which will limit deforestation and ensure that our surroundings and wilderness areas remain preserved and grow futher more enriching more wilf life which benefits the mankind in one or the other way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 33
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g demands have already vanished a lot of forest area in order to support our grow...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd vanished a lot of them. Wild life is a also essential to support the ecosystem...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...l ultimatly threatens human as well. Therefore there is a strict need for this policy ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich will limit deforestation and ensure that our surroundings and wilderness are...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, then, therefore, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 58.6224719101 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 249.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94779116466 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72463840852 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566265060241 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 23.0359550562 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.41365422 60.3974514979 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 205.333333333 118.986275619 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.5 23.4991977007 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.21951772744 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255711053318 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123185370961 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923429646031 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147025570115 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102087832034 0.0667264976115 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 14.1392134831 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 48.8420337079 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.32 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.2143820225 164% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.