"The Gordon Act, which established a wildlife refuge in the Big Dark Swamp, is currently up for reauthorization. The act prohibits the building of roads or cutting of old growth trees in the swamp, though it permits hunting. Many blamed logging activities for the decline of the bird population, especially that of the dappled grackle. The grackle population has continued to decline since the passage of the law, demonstrating that the Gordon Act has not been sufficient to protect the species. Another nearby refuge, the Wayne County Marsh Habitat, bans all mining, logging, and hunting. Wayne County officials have not reported a decline in the grackle population there. This proves that hunting, not logging, was responsible for the population drop in Broomall County. Thus, Broomall County should not reauthorize the Gordon Act unless it is amended to include the same provisions as those in Wayne County."
The statement adverts about a possible reauthorization which includes banning building roads, cutting old growths and permitting hunting in order to prevent drop in grackle population, additionally, they compare Gordon Act to another intervention and they suggest that Gordon is insufficient. However, there are overlooked logical fallacies, misjudgments and unconvincing claims, therefore, they should reveal some examples and evindence which they take as basis in order to be persuasive and ameliorate their suggestion.
Firstly, there is a false assumption that the conditions in Broomall County adnd Wayne County is similar, followingly, a plan has worked on Wayne should also reveal same result for them, hence Gordon should revise their acting. There is a high prospect that the environment may be not same and prohibiting hunting may cause more broad consequences by affecting biodiversity and ecological equilibrium. We have instances in which sometimes some decreases in some species are beneficial for the ecolocial equilibrium since they may be preadator of a species who are in extinction at more serious level and providing valuable materials for photosynthesis. Hence, this statement should be strengthened by supplying elaborated information of present diverstiy and comparison between these counties.
Secondly, they claim that the Gordon Act is no sufficient, followingly, they should add some provisions from Wayne County. However, they have not provided further detail about the main aim and target of Gordon Act since if they were ambitious merely on bird population, it is more likely to forbid huntings. In addition. To put it another way, there should be some other target population need to be prevented from extinction, they should give more details about their Act to clarify before denigrating strictly by saying that this Gordon act is insufficient.
Lastly, their poor reasoning about the causes of decrease in population should provide more evidences, that is to say, they relates this decrease directly to hunting and loggind without serving any evidence. Furthermer, they seem manipulating and distorting fact by equivocating in the absence of such evidences. As a result, they should advert about their findings and results of their conducted research to grant that hunting and logging is the main reason behind this so that they should ban in order to hinder this important species from extinction.
Ultimately, all these logical fallacies and poor reasoning considered, this statement has some flaws and absent evidences and they should consider and provide this necessary materails in order to be convincing.
- If rituals did not exist we have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help us define ourselves social and culturally. 33
- A true university encompasses far more than the narrow specialized study of a single discipline. Only through exploring the broad spectrum of liberal arts courses can the students become truly learned. 70
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 50
- Only once one has known real sadness can one feel true happiness 75
- Science is meaningless without religion. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e reauthorization which includes banning building roads, cutting old growths and ...
^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rop in grackle population, additionally, they compare Gordon Act to another inter...
^^
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents and unconvincing claims, therefore, they should reveal some examples and evi...
^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in extinction at more serious level and providing valuable materials for photosy...
^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by supplying elaborated information of present diverstiy and comparison between...
^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...im that the Gordon Act is no sufficient, followingly, they should add some provis...
^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...t is more likely to forbid huntings. In addition. To put it another way, there should be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'relate'
Suggestion: relate
...de more evidences, that is to say, they relates this decrease directly to hunting and l...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in addition, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 28.8173652695 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 404.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58168316832 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9786547022 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 204.123752495 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537128712871 0.468620217663 115% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 4.96107784431 302% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.8473053892 136% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.286621655 57.8364921388 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.461538462 119.503703932 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0769230769 23.324526521 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 5.70786347227 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0894275046236 0.218282227539 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351620948361 0.0743258471296 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452586279668 0.0701772020484 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545669163515 0.128457276422 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480236007241 0.0628817314937 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 14.3799401198 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.3550499002 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.197005988 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.68 12.5979740519 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.32208582834 118% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 98.500998004 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 12.3882235529 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.1389221557 129% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.9071856287 168% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.