It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the local historical events play a vital role in terms of children education rather than the past of the world. From my perspective, I partly agree with this stance because of several primary grounds.
On the one hand, the specific details in local history can be considered as the fundamental basis in order to improve and develop both economy and society in every country, meaning that the correlations in the bygone days might be used as a tool to determine and adjust the future plans in terms of country development. Secondly, were children to study their national history, the basic information can be collected and encouraged, which results in their attention in the national policy and human rights since they completely mature.
On the other hand, there is no doubt that the international relationships as well as the global institutions are partly based on the world history. A clear illustration of this is that developed countries, which contributed to cause the detrimental damages during the war, try to financially support others to help them increase their economy and the global site as well. Besides, although the information of the global past is more general than the local history, it does not mean children who are the next generation cannot effectively apply in the reality. Such general historical events are useful to widen children’s knowledge and stimulate them to approach the overseas, experience the diversity culture, comprehend developing institutions of other countries, and then, transfer into their own ideas, which are utterly applied to develop their country, or especially their local community.
In conclusion, both local and global history, depending on variety cases, have differently important roles. Instead of only focusing on one of them, school systems should design and divide logically.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-23 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- Some peole claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirements.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 61
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 78
- Some peole claim that not enough of the waste from home is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirements.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 61
- Euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of terminally ill patients or someone in a great pain A few countries in the world allow euthanasia to be praticed by doctors though it is still a very controversial issue What is your opinion on the matter 89
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31525423729 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8668227701 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596610169492 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.5432639078 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.8 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168253792341 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683178393882 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493304958245 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101035491945 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258963459351 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.