Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today."
There is no shortage of debate about how the technical advances and increasing population is going to affect our transportation habits in future. In my opinion, the number of cars on the road after twenty years will be much less than what we see today. I feel this way due to two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, with the advancement of technology, the quality and reach of public transportation is also increasing. Moreover, with options like hyperloop coming into picture public transportation is going to be faster and better way to transit in twenty years from now. We already have metro and bullet trains available which provides a faster travel alternatives for cars. My own experience is a compelling example for this. I used to travel by car to my college when there was no metro station nearby and it took me about thirty minutes to reach college. However, when the metro station was built in the area I live in I preferred metro over my car because it was cheaper and faster. For this reason, I strongly believe that number of cars in use will decline in future.
Secondly, the research going on in the field of alternate transportation is overwhelming. Companies are working on options like flying cars and cheaper jetpacks. For instance, a few years back from now we never thought about drone delivery but now Amazon is using drones to deliver products at our doorsteps. So it is not a pipe dream to imagine people using drones for personal transportation. As transit through air has always been a faster way of transportation, if made abundant and readily available most people would prefer it over a car. Accordingly, I think that the availability of alternate personal transportation will decrease the number of cars in future.
To conclude, I assert that advancement in technology will be able to provide us better alternatives in the form of an advance public transport and faster and better options in personal transportation which will eventually result in the declining usage of cars. Hence, I have sufficient reasons to believe that twenty years from now we will see fewer cars in use than we see today.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? "In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today." 73
- PROMPT: The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal. "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimula 66
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 54
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 60
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ing to affect our transportation habits in future. In my opinion, the number of cars on t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 764, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...that number of cars in use will decline in future. Secondly, the research going on in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 659, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tation will decrease the number of cars in future. To conclude, I assert that advance...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, i think, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85983827493 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87050225642 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512129380054 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.279276428 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.166666667 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195620916877 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631571284328 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665332405122 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13742178757 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431316948349 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.