Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers are important for the transmission of knowledge, from the past to nowadays. When it comes to the appreciation of them by the society, I disagree with the statement that they are less valued in the current and will clarify my reasons in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, teachers receive better payment in the modern society than their counterparts did in the past overall. The material reward people get from doing their job is a significant index of the importance a society attaches to their professions. As common sense tells us, the more you get paid, the higher your value is appreciated. Nowadays, the payment of teachers is relatively better than they did decades ago. For example, my parents, both teachers, tell me that their monthly income was around ten yuan or so when they started the career. Back then they have to save money for months to buy a bike. While the situation now is totally different, they earn around ten thousand yuan a month, which is a decent payment in China comparing to most professions. As is shown from the increase of teachers' salary, they are more valued by the society now than they did in the past.
Moreover, the society is paying more attention to the career development of teachers.
Admittedly, some people may argue that students in the ancient time show better manner to teachers. For example, they kneel down to the teachers. Thus the past society respects teachers more. This view falsely reduces the express of respect to the action of kneeling down while ignores the good manner of students nowadays such as greeting to and helping teachers. So this opinion is not sufficiently supported.
To put it in a nutshell, as we can see from the evidence provided above, it is no doubt that teachers nowadays are much highly appreciated and valued than they did before, in terms of material and spirit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Sarrraaa | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | 3dra | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | wang kuan huan | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | bishal sitaula | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ample, they kneel down to the teachers. Thus the past society respects teachers more...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85579937304 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61426594947 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539184952978 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0450336613 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1176470588 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319081850476 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100959084779 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862776194097 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158995699826 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887132562137 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.