tpo 47
The reading and the lecture both discuss the capacity of the large pterosaurs to powered flight or whether they were able only to glide. On the first hand, the reading states that there are several arguments have been made against powered flight. On the other hand, the lecture refutes this, by saying that the Pterosaurs were cabable of powred flight.
First of all, the reading clearly claims that since modern reptiles are cold-blooded, ancient reptiles such as pterosaurs were probably cold-blooded as well so pterosaurs would not have been able to generate the energy needed to fly. However, the lecture argues that reacent researches related with pterosaurs conclude that have a warm blood because it has a skin covering by a hiar. Furthermore, the professor sattes that consequently this hair makes it is blood has high-tempreture.
In addition, the reading makes the argument is that some pterosaurs have probably so heavy that they would not have been able to flap their wings fast enough to stay aloft for any length of time. The lecture argues this point by stating that recent discoveries indicate pterosaurs have a holo bones which make them weight low nough to stay aloft for any length of time.
Lastly, the reading a really argues that all animals absolutely with powered flight are able to take off from the ground. The lecture definitely counter this claim by pointing out that pterosaurs use four legs to jump because they walk on the land by using four legs, but not like birds which walk using on the land using tow legs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, lastly, really, so, well, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92366412214 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4307913478 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541984732824 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.80848134 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499588709203 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197686952699 0.0996497079465 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122700165537 0.0662205650399 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284709426903 0.162205337803 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784348645439 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.