vessels that archaeologist found in iraq
The main idea of both the passage and the lecture is about the vessels that archaeologist found in Iraq and they thought this vessels that contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod were ancient electric batteries. Considering this, the author claims that it is not likely that vessels were actually used as electric batteries in old times. The professor, on the other hand, categorically denies whatever mentioned in the passage through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about other facilities such as metal wires as an electricity conductor must be found where the vessels found. According to the passage, there is no evidence that any metal wires were located near the vessels. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the author's view and illustrates the idea that this vessels was found by archaeologist and it is possible that they neglect the other objects around the vessels and maybe some of them would be a metal wires.
Second of all, both the passage and the lecture discuss the issue of similarity between these vessels and the copper cylinders that discovered in the ruins of Seleucia. The passage goes on to mention that these cylinders were used for holding scrolls and not for generating electricity. Nonetheless, the lecturer supports a contradictory view as compared to that presented in the reading; she describes that although the cylinders that found in Seleucia were used for holding scrolls maybe some inventor in Iraq used this vessels in order to create electricity.
Eventually, the passage and the lecture both discuss usage of electricity in ancient society. The author of the reading passage states that they had no devices that replied on electricity, so they did not need batteries; however, the speaker refutes it, saying that ancient people used electricity to show some of them had a magical force or another use of electricity is for healing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-02 | ilda | 71 | view |
| 2017-11-19 | mahdyarghaeminia | 73 | view |
- ethanol instead of gasoline 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require every graduating students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 78
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree. 55
- The college years are the best time in a person s life Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Give specific reasons to support your position 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eologist found in Iraq and they thought this vessels that contained a copper cylinde...
^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...hors view and illustrates the idea that this vessels was found by archaeologist and ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...crolls maybe some inventor in Iraq used this vessels in order to create electricity....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16293929712 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72289206689 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492012779553 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8403350917 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.909090909 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4545454545 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269630646831 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103711141723 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121310890099 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168515567881 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112328973501 0.0443174109184 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.