TPO 34
The reading specifies that there are three theories about the main cause of the extinction of the sea cow. However, the professor explains that we cannot find out what make sea cows extinct and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First of all, the author states that sea cows were a good source of food and native siberian people hunted sea cows for many years and after a while they become extinct. The professor opposes this point by saying that the sew cows were a massive creature and weight ten ton and capturing couple of them could feed many people for a month and also the population of native siberian people were few and they did not need to hunt sea cow a lot.
Second, based on the reading, there was ecosystems disturbances which declined the main source of food of sea cows and these change help its extinction. The lecturer assert that if sever ecosystems disturbances happen and decline the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal and not just kelp and native people do not record any food shortage and it is not feasible that because of the ecological changes sea cows extinct.
Third, according to the reading, when European fur traders come to the island, they had many weapons that allow them to capture and kill sea cows and because of this sea cows extinct. The speaker contradicts the idea reasoning that the population of sea cows decreases before European fur traders come to the island and it was another main reason that cause sea cows population decreases consistently, not because of the European fur traders.
Therefore, the specific reasons mentioned in the reading do not make sense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-15 | ormon200678 | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | rassata | 70 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | ellen87713 | view | |
| 2022-01-30 | omega93 | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | vida00 | 80 | view |
- TPO 34 81
- TPO 34 81
- tpo 33 76
- It is more important for students to learn concepts and ideas than it is for them to learn facts 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...essor opposes this point by saying that the sew cows were a massive creature and weight...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...hange help its extinction. The lecturer assert that if sever ecosystems disturbances h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changes'?
Suggestion: changes
...cline the main food of sea cow, it also change the population of other marine animal a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75432525952 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35984637079 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505190311419 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.113193374 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.666666667 110.228320801 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1111111111 21.698381199 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.600856200261 0.272083759551 221% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.285624483299 0.0996497079465 287% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127933632538 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312989195388 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159853199539 0.0443174109184 361% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 53.8541721854 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.