In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory.Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting?
The substantial influences of compulsory voting have sparked a controversy amongst the public. Although specific argument claimed that compulsory voting is against the human right, a group of intellectuals debate otherwise and hold opponent's view. I am highly inclined to believe that forced voting could have many benefits for a society. The agenda of this article is to discuss both sides of the mandatory choosing system, which verifies how it impacts a country and will reach a legitimate conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why an obligatory choosing system is supported. The most remarkable one lied in the fact that nominated candidates for presidential election or senate senators must have the support of the highest majority of the people. Hence, it can be clearly seen that mandate-voting forces people to follow the election campaign news and review candidates plans. For instance, in Australia, election news covers 35% of the total headline in a month before the election due date. So compulsory selections could affect democratic society, parliament, as well as the house of representatives.
Contrary to popular belief, there remain drawbacks clouded up the potential influences of compulsory selection, but the most alarming one rooted in the fact that right-wing party can win the most seats in a Senate. Based on recent research, conducted by a group of profound political activists in an eminent university, in an obligatory pulling, left-wing candidates have 20% less chance than green party and one nation candidates to win the election. Therefore, the importance of political party in a democratic social system must be considered highly by people.
To recapitulate, while there are several divergent opinions on both sides, my sentiment is that the benefits of an obligatory voting system take more credence that its potential drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jenifer | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Daniel Torres | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | smb.arami | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Daniel Torres | 77 | view |
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 85
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do u think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 85
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact 85
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion?Support it with personal examples. 80
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory.Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98510811708 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598639455782 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6881888945 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.769230769 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116284328321 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445274656303 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470613594912 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740035389348 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594088272536 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.