Research shows that overeating can be as harmful as smoking. Thus the advertising of certain food products should be banned, as that of cigar is banned in many countries. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that eating too much and smoking have detrimental effects on health. In many nations, the governments have banned cigar advertisements, some people suggest certain food advertising should be forbidden as well. In this essay, I will outline why I disagree with this to some extent.
I concede that there could be reasons why banning some particular food ads and perhaps the obvious one is that those products may well be much less exposed to consumers. By doing so, the countries can enable citizens to have less access to unhealthy food sources and this potentially leads to people turning to nutritional diet options and consequently increasing the likelihood of them staying healthy., Binglang, For instance, a traditional Taiwan snack having some ingredients which are harmful to eye sights, has its advertisements being banned for several years in Taiwan. As such, this snack has been much less popular among the majority of consumers, which means it prevents people from eating unhealthily.
Nevertheless, I feel that it is unnecessary to forbid the advertising of certain food. Firstly, food ads do not typically result in overeating and other problems. When the governments ban these ads, people still have a wide range of food choices available, thereby meaning it remains possible for them to favor other unhealthy food containing high levels of sugar and fat. What this shows is that banning advertising cannot address this issue completely. Instead, the countries should invariably raise people’s awareness of maintianing a healthy diet instead of banning ads. Chocolate cream cakes ads, for instance, very tempting dessert advertisements, attract many people, especially the children, to try their flavour. As such, parents should teach their children the drawbacks of consuming these kinds of junk food excessively and look after their diets, which is ultimately why overeating is largely depends on personal dietary habits.
In conclusion, I think that, although banning certain food advertisements should be one of ways to reduce overeating problem, more effective measures can be taken to tackle it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-23 | sinbad20000 | 89 | view |
| 2017-12-23 | sinbad20000 | 89 | view |
- Research shows that overeating can be as harmful as smoking. Thus the advertising of certain food products should be banned, as that of cigar is banned in many countries. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Research shows that overeating can be as harmful as smoking. Thus the advertising of certain food products should be banned, as that of cigar is banned in many countries. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesights'.
Suggestion: eyesights
...g some ingredients which are harmful to eye sights, has its advertisements being banned fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, well, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41616766467 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90065993053 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.4044698443 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.214285714 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302906294387 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102747182179 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890519037686 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200818442852 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493860881754 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.