Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture both are discussing the possibility of human presence on Venus. The reading states that it is impossible to find the human presence on the Venus because of the extreme and inhospitable condition of Venus and the author provides three reasons to prove the claim. The Lecturer casts doubt on every reason presented in the writing.
Firstly, the Professor states that the pressure of Venus's surface is not too high than that of the earth. He adds that no Spacecraft will be crushed by this pressure which clearly contradicts the Information said in the article. It is also mentioned in the reading that human will be also crushed in Venus. The lecture contradicts this possibility.
Secondly, the author of the reading contends that there is no water, oxygen or water vapor and there is carbon dioxide, sulfuric acid. He continues that water and oxygen need to be supplied to the planet from earth which is impractical. The lecturer refutes this claim and notes that a water and oxygen can be produced easily by using a chemical process. He also suggests that it can be done by using Venus's atmosphere.
Finally, according to the reading, very little sunlight can reach to the planet's surface as carbon dioxide below the thick clouds blocks the light. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the clouds are not thick and through these clouds, light can easily pass to the planet's surface. He puts forth the idea by providing information that sunlight can be used to generate power.
As we have seen, the claims made in the reading have been successfully refuted by the lecturer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-08 | LKL | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | rosedudu | 3 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | mattayousak | 3 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | mattayousak | 3 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | iscaxap | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people enjoy the life more than older people do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 66
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. Use specific reasons and examples 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...vides three reasons to prove the claim. The Lecturer casts doubt on every reason pr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90145985401 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50710801553 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510948905109 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8425979846 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5333333333 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117913410067 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452409954058 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363721956871 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648137509075 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02596248807 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.