integrated essay TPO13
The article states that commerce of fossil have been a negative effect of scintists and the general public and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that though the buying of fossil is harmful but doing of it is highly benificial than don't it and refutes each of the authors reasons.
First, the reading states that this condition is terrible to public people because they haven't any places sach as museum to visti old fossil. The professor refutes this point by saying that the commercial fossil collector for sailing their fossils exhibits all of them more than every other places such as museum or exibition. Hence, the whole people and big and small orgenizatons can visit them and buy them if they need to them for theaching, decoration, experiment or so on.
Second, the article claims that the scintest hadn't oppertunuty to study and experiment on new descovering fossils. However, the professor contends that orginal or fake fossils that finding in every locations by everyone must be detected by relevant expert so planty of scientists in this fields have a good chance for study and income.
Third, the reading avers that considerable scintific proof ruin by fossil collectors when they excavat for finding them. The professer says that universities and many research institution unable to discover and dig up completely all of the fossils. Consequently, it is better that they will be had numerous fossils than many of those will have remained without finding.
- independent essay-TPO46 3
- Do you agree or disagree?Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. 61
- integrated essay tpo19 73
- Do you agree or disagree? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainments and athletics, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 76
- Do you agree or disagree?People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers-than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisor. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... a negative effect of scintists and the general public and provides three reasons of support. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t doing of it is highly benificial than dont it and refutes each of the authors reas...
^^^^
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... terrible to public people because they havent any places sach as museum to visti old ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...d, the article claims that the scintest hadnt oppertunuty to study and experiment on ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...evant expert so planty of scientists in this fields have a good chance for study and...
^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: much research; a good deal of research
...he professer says that universities and many research institution unable to discover and dig ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...nable to discover and dig up completely all of the fossils. Consequently, it is better tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12195121951 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58358838525 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.669543729 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379636376614 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139370982894 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801216098011 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214772291571 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541622715412 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.