Protecting environment is the responsibility of multinational organisations rather than the responsibility of each government. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is true that the ever severe environmental degradation is taking a heavy toll on people’s life. Although some state that international organisations, rather than national government, should shoulder the importance of multinational institutions nor local authorities can be disregarded.
There is no doubt that multinational organisations have been playing an essential role in protecting and restoring our government. First of all, internationalised environmental organisations such as International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) have more power than local governments in enforcing globalised environmental regulations and standards. This is because such institutions are always united by highly experienced professionals, who normally possess a bigger voice in their specialist fields. Additionally, the funds purposed on protecting local environment will be reasonably allocated to poor countries under the supervision of these organisations. For instant, the World Wildlife Foundation (WWF) ensures the allocation of several million dollars every year to poverty countries like Kenya and Congo to support their environmental restoration programmes.
Nevertheless, the significance of national governments in protecting environment also cannot be underestimated. To begin with, local authorities can stimulate manufacturers to employ greener and more efficient technologies by providing financial incentives like compensations and subsidies. With the introduction of these technologies into the product line, local environment will be tremendously improved. Furthermore, environmental laws also need to be legislated by local government. For example, through enabling the environmental protection act, the pollution released by industrial sector in China has been dramatically reduced.
In conclusion, I agree with the idea that both multinational institutions and national governments are important in protecting the environment. Therefore, the responsibility should be shared equally between them.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 66
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Summarize the infor 75
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 74
- Anyone with phones can answer calls for both social and personal purposes at any time. More benefits or drawbacks do you think it will bring to both society and individuals? 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Although some state that international organisations, rather than national government, should shoulder the importance of multinational institutions nor local authorities can be disregarded.
prescription: what is the main sentence? and 'nor' is not used properly here
'nor' examples:
The Zoology Department where it is housed has neither money nor expertise to maintain it.
There was no trace of cancer, nor was there any indication that she had ever had any!
There is no shortage of work for Lalonde, nor does he expect one any time soon.
they looked neither to left nor right
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 271 350
No. of Characters: 1709 1500
No. of Different Words: 175 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.057 4.7
Average Word Length: 6.306 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.67 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 83 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.357 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.601 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.322 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.535 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.049 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.45756457565 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.7693397307 2.80592935109 134% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645756457565 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9580621103 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192457924733 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634696784307 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466503881372 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120379437489 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390396124848 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.19 12.4159519038 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.