Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the past, people were more inclined towards working in the same organisation for their entire life. Today, different individuals have a varied opinion about the work options. Nowadays, it is believed by some of the folks that they should work for the same company all their working life while other argued that they should change the company as per their conditions. From my point of view, I agree that people should work for the same organization. This essay will analyze both the views properly.
On the one hand, people working in the same company are treated as loyal employees. Similarly, they can gain great respect from other employees and can be promoted to higher officer. Furthermore, Government companies provide the system of pension to the employees who work for more than 25 years in the same company. Also, it will be easy for the people to cooperate with other employees if they work for the same company. For instance, People will get rewards and bonus in several occasions if they work for same company. As per the recent studies in UK and USA, it is known that most of the people are working for the same organizations.
On the other hand, it is denied by some people to work in the same company. First and foremost, they cannot shift to other company if they find the salary more than the company they are working for. Secondly, it will be more beneficial to move to other companies and get proper links to many other peoples.
In conclusion, it is the people who should be aware of choosing the right company for their future success. By analyzing both the views, I would strongly recommend people to seek for the company whose reputation is higher than other companies. In addition to this, folks should look for the organizations which are more flexible as per their needs and perspectives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-26 | deniy94 | 56 | view |
| 2018-05-26 | n0air9x9 | 78 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Sagarjango | 56 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Sagarjango | 56 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Sagarjango | 56 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013. 73
- The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 73
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which three you consider the most effective.ComicBooksRadioTelevisionFilmTheaterGive reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...rk options. Nowadays, it is believed by some of the folks that they should work for the sam...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same company all their working life while other argued that they should chan...
^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at they should change the company as per their conditions. From my point of view,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78481012658 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47437597234 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462025316456 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0165710816 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9411764706 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444395027955 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179033605512 0.084324248473 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095037009547 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29696354422 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126141196914 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.