The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.
________________________________________
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position
As they say that "Ignorance is Bliss." Is it really true? Does anyone have ever led to comprehend something by rejecting any knowledge or familiarity with the subject? Many of us would say no. I would say that familiarity is the key to self knowledge. It is actually what is required to know one's true self and how it functions in certain situations. One could fathom from the behavioral and cognitive responses, made in certain situations that reveal the true self and increase the understanding of their own true self.
Reflecting on behavioral response made in certain situation, like being upset when someone pillories you or is angry with you for the reason you do not know makes you feel at unease and this familiarity of emotions you feel disconcert you and helps you wonder why the person is feeling that way and what has led him/her say such things and if you have not said or done anything wrong then why does that disconcert you. It is this awareness of emotions that makes you discern the reason why. Also, when you wonder that you always make a certain response in similar situations may lead you to wonder why it is always the same.
Like the behavioral response, the mind always have a similar way of perceiving things and people. For example, one would go to the same restaurant and orders the same meal every time because they like that particular dish. Or that buying the same type of shirts in a store based on your liking. These familiarities, may or may not be pointed by someone, makes people wonder about the structure they intentionally or unintentionally follow and may guide them towards self affinity.
All in all, the identical behavioral and cognitive responses in identical situations may be triggers for finding out the true knowledge of oneself, because familiarity actually guides you to the unknown. The question of why assist us in seeing why not and that rejecting it might not be beneficial in the discovery of self.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-11-25 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 54 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | reemks12 | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | hhj | 66 | view |
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 50
- "Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men 18
- The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.________________________________________Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you t 50
- "The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition." - Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 50
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, really, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82595870206 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75085411032 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492625368732 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.5129579428 60.3974514979 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.066666667 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294155840965 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799824745671 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893068649758 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150687653348 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114472770321 0.0667264976115 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.