In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? (Give your reasons.)
Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this.
In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? (Give your reasons.)
Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this.
Recently, the phenomenon of the evaluation of a student’s performance and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the written test is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that formal examinations can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From an educational standpoint, a student’s assessment can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that passing a test, as well as failing a test, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the oral examination. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the practical training and continuous assessment apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the method of evaluation, traditional exams might increase the consequences of the pressure of exams. Moreover, fundamental aspects of getting a good mark relate to this reality that the demerits of a bad performance pertain to cheating in the exam. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the compulsory education is correlated negatively with the skill development. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the academic achievement.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the formal evaluation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a time-limited test prove the significance of the fundamental knowledge, but also pinpoint the objective of education implications.
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- The Ability to communicate in more than one language will be less important in the future than it is now.” Do you Agree or disagree with this statement? Provide Support for your opinion. 88
- Essay topics: Essay topics: Radio and TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 88
- The Ability to communicate in more than one language will be less important in the future than it is now.” Do you Agree or disagree with this statement? Provide Support for your opinion. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... are the only effective way to assess a students performance. Continual assessment such ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 322.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49689440994 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43339520237 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590062111801 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 379.143842365 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6441778642 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.117647059 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438344680381 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141588723117 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163182451058 0.071462118173 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260681613484 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.249043913899 0.0609392437508 409% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.