Should the government preserve old buildings or build new ones?
People often hold different perspective on whether the government should preserve old buildings or build new ones. Based on my personal experience and observation of life, I strongly argued that the government should preserve old buildings.
First of all, the government should care about the history, and preserving old building can help the government preserve the history. For example, several countries in Asia have the history as colonies. Colonizers come from western countries built the western style buildings in the colonies. That is why nowadays there are so many western style old buildings in Asian countries like Vietnam and India. Also, these western style buildings are cultural heritage of the colonial history.
Secondly, the government is concerned about the budget, but building new buildings costs a great deal of budget. For example, the Taiwanese government built the famous skyscraper named Taipei 101. To build Taipei 101, it needed to hire so many engineers, architects and workers. Also, the building materials for Taipei 101 were expensive because they were all imported from France. Actually, the government spent about 300 million US dollars to build Taipei 101. Apparently, building new buildings really spends a lot.
Last but not last, the government should put emphasis on residents, and preserving old buildings can show how much it care about them. Actually, residents have profound sentiment for old buildings. For instance, there is an old train station built about 100 years ago in the city I live, and the government preserves it well. Among 100 years, countless people get on and off trains and many stories about separation and reunion occur at this station. Needless to say that this old train station is an emotional symbol for residents. As a result, the government should preserve old buildings to satisfy residents' need.
In conclusion, the government should preserve old buildings, rather than build new ones. That is to say, since the government cares about the history, budget and public perception. It is needed for the government to preserve old buildings.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes people think nowadays the media TV newspaper Internet are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public 87
- TPO 22 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what field they study in. 60
- Should the government invest money to improve Internet access or public transportation? 60
- TPO 43 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vernment should preserve old buildings. First of all, the government should care...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: LAST_BUT_NOT_LAST[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean: 'Last but not least'?
Suggestion: Last but not least
...g new buildings really spends a lot. Last but not last, the government should put emphasis on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cares'?
Suggestion: cares
...ving old buildings can show how much it care about them. Actually, residents have pr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34730538922 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68398436965 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505988023952 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8947416325 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.1818181818 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.40909090909 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.579825017841 0.236089414692 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207467353095 0.076458572812 271% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169051299215 0.0737576698707 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.391993660416 0.150856017488 260% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883217303658 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.