The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories.
The line graph compares the average number of hours taken to produce a car by four different companies in the USA from 1998 to 2005.
Overall, there was a reduction in the average time to produce a vehicle in all four manufactures throughout the period. whereas, General Motor reduced a car production time by more than the others.
From the highest figure of about 32 hours in 1998, General Motor declined remarkably the average amount of time to manufacture a car to 22 hours in 2005. By contrast, Ford just spent 28 hours on producing a car in 1998. Although there was a reaching a peak of about 32 hours in 2001, the car production time for Ford then dropped gradually to around 21 hours in 2005.
There was a same figure at the beginning of the period for Honda and Toyota in term of the average time to produce a car, at 22 hours in 1998. despite many minor fluctuations during the following years, these both companies finally finished at 22 hours in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-05 | lieutran0793@gmail.com | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...our manufactures throughout the period. whereas, General Motor reduced a car production...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...our manufactures throughout the period. whereas, General Motor reduced a car production...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Despite
... to produce a car, at 22 hours in 1998. despite many minor fluctuations during the foll...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 5.05154639175 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 26.3917525773 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 937.175257732 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 206.0 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52571428571 4.54256449028 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50911155916 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 127.690721649 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502857142857 0.622605031667 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.2466423756 44.8134815571 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 76.5299724578 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 4.34317383033 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285815159852 0.216113520407 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145239959995 0.0766984524023 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803810586688 0.0603063233224 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194941700488 0.12726935374 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479626136463 0.0580467560999 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 8.37731958763 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 8.71597938144 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 41.2886597938 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.