NOWADAYS MANY PEOPLE PREFER TO USE THEIR OWN CARS TO COMMUTE RATHER THAN BUSES AND TRAINS. WHYDO YOU THINK IT IS HAPPENING? WHAT CAN GOVERNMENT DO TO CHANGE IT?
Transportation modes have undergone dramatic changes over a recent couple of decades. At present, prevalence of private vehicles to carry out daily travelling is on the peak and it has therefore sent the preference of public transport on the back seat. Here, I would like to establish possible causes behind this happening along with active steps that should be taken by the authorities to change it.
There are immense grounds that can be mentioned. To commence with, cars offer wide range of amenities that public vehicles deprive in. To be very specific, one can relish a journey at own convenience and comfort. What is more, folks can get great deal of privacy and relaxation which is quite herculean to attain in the buses and trains. Consequently, cars are thought to be extremely advantageous as compared to other modes of commuting.
Further emphasizing on the reasons of this trend, an individual is able to explore much more places of interest at any time. To illustrate, buses and trains may not have an access to exotic destinations as they may be far away from main roads. Apart from it, masses my not face any hesitation to carry bulk of luggage bags that is far away from the consideration in public modes due to immense crowd and hustle bustle. On hammering the final nail, cars are the superb source to carry out long and short journeys with safety and satisfaction.
There are numerous steps that can be taken by the government in order to curtail this problem. First and foremost, government should reduce the cost of tickets in buses, trains and subways. Along with it, Furnishing and modifying buses and trains with modern amenities will be worthwhile to lure more and more commuters. Furthermore, imposition of pollution tax on cars will surely decline its number on roads.
To recapitulate, in this jet age of 21st century it is beyond the bounds of possibility to imagine our life without commuting on private modes. However, one should use these modes precisely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-14 | Rose sandhu12 | 95 | view |
- Some people say that government should build sport facilities for professional athletes Others believe that such facilities should be open to everyone Discuss both views with your opinion 72
- Some people believe that young people should have university education, because this will bring benefit to the society. Others, however, believe that it will lead to graduate unemployment. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Humans tend to copy one another, especially in fashion, choice of clothes and consumer goods. Do you agree or disagree? Provide your view and examples from your own experience 78
- Major companies use sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 96
- Some people think that health care should be free for everyone. Others think that people should pay for their medical costs themselves. Discuss both the views with your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ompared to other modes of commuting. Further emphasizing on the reasons of this tren...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...lustrate, buses and trains may not have an access to exotic destinations as they may be f...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, apart from, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71731243107 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9691221819 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13374984876 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040132199825 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277169178051 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694895208726 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381466088073 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.