with an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.
To what extent do you agree?
Conversation, either one-to-one or through WhatsApp, face book, twitter and other socializing networks portrayed an integral role in human beings life. However, the mode of communication varies from one person to others. Despite, of the fact that growing number of populace is utilizing the internet and texting applications for their intercourse, I strongly disagree that face-to-face meet up will be considered as outdates.
Firstly, to begin with, it is apparent that modern technology had developed various tremendous tools which assisted inhabitants around the world to get connected at their ease. In addition, utilization of clever gadgets manifested that communication gap between family members and friends has narrowed. Furthermore, this mode of interaction is suitable for the shy orators who are hesitant of facing public and usually get nervous.
Nevertheless, in spite of availability of such vast telecommunication resources, we cannot deny the significance of the live meets up with friends and love ones. Nevertheless, some messages lose their passion and feelings while conveying them through text. For instance, the abundant group of people still prefer tangible chitchat where they can perceive each other emotions and sentiments.
On contrary, it is observed that individuals still travel from one place to other to meet and greet their love ones physically and to create lavish memories and quality time. For example, during festive season, a lot of folks come across to see each other.
To sum up, both ways of communication are imperative for human beings. Thus, it is our perception and modus vivendi which persuade us to opt for the diverse mode of conversation with our near and dears. Notwithstanding, each style has their own significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-16 | Mohamedyousef777 | 95 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | Mohamedyousef777 | 78 | view |
| 2018-02-28 | uzma2011 | 41 | view |
| 2018-02-28 | uzma2011 | 11 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | shivangi patel | 11 | view |
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 84
- with an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 11
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house/ flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letterexplain the reasons for the noiseapologisedescribe what action you will takeYou should write at least 150 words 56
- Write to college accomodation officer for renting room in your apartment.Tell where is your apartmentDescribe your roomWhat kind of person you prefer 56
- With an increasing population communicating via the internet and text messaging, face to face communication will become a thing of the past.To what extent do you agree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...rks portrayed an integral role in human beings life. However, the mode of communicatio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in spite of, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50729927007 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07898794482 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693430656934 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2355130212 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.785714286 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135749444781 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424964424256 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435566742513 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682879642307 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620314820438 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.