Should people work in the same company or for the same employer for their whole life?
Outwardly, it appears to be a desired privilege for an employee to be granted a life-long post in a company. No longer will he be involved in the tense competitions on the job market and a stable professional future is held in his hand. However, such an ideal expectation has a series of hidden limits that should be emphasized. Today our modern society is advancing at a remarkable speed. Not a single person is capable of foreseeing the future that is full of a million uncertainties. As a result, in my opinion, it is nave to dream of a life-employment opportunity nowadays.
There is no denying that serving under one employer for life might have been advantageous in the past. Under the planned economy, China used to designate life-long posts for college graduates. For those who were offered such a position, they were blessed with stable incomes and ample staff welfare. This ensured pay helped enhance their living standard and overall life quality. In addition, the company was just like a big family where all members were united and determined to make contributions. As for the leaders, they were able to keep their working forces going strong with employees cooperating and working together. To some degree, it also helped maintain social stability.
Nonetheless, the market-based economy today makes life-long employment unrealistic. A series of complicated social elements are the major obstacles that force job hunters or employees to give up the ideal of a life-long position. To illustrate, modern economy can never do without personnel transfer, which is the symbol of a vigorous job market. The growing number of candidates has made the competition fiercer than before. As a result, even if one succeeds in filling a long-term post, he is still faced with unexpected challenges from other employees or new job hunters. Besides, the prosperous economic environment encompasses more potential opportunities for the working class. Whenever a better job opportunity in a different company appears, few people would wait around, but would strive to improve their situation instead.
On the part of the employers, most of them are unwilling to offer life-long positions. A major reason lies in exceedingly heavy financial burdens. Some bosses also fear that if there is no pressure of job losses, employees will lose the impetus to make progress and thus working efficiency might be negatively affected.
In conclusion, both the job candidates and the employees ought to adopt objective views on their career life. The social reality today no longer allows people to become absolute idealists and perfectionists. As a matter of fact, it is unimportant whether one can work for the same company for their whole life or not. What really matters is to be prepared for new opportunities and potential changes that might appear in one's future endeavor toward success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-12 | bearguodeguang | 86 | view |
- What can help you to succeed 81
- The only way the government can conserve energy 85
- Is relating well to others more important than studying hard? 76
- Land: for human needs or for endangered animals? 70
- Should the government focus more on preserving natural environment and less on economic development? 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, nonetheless, really, so, still, thus, as for, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17307692308 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93300268468 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 771.3 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3604566375 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7037037037 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331777404017 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743753954417 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1013263272 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170371713442 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110744092218 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.